Belief revision and computational argumentation: a critical comparison

Baroni, Pietro; Fermé, Eduardo; Giacomin, Massimiliano; Simari, Guillermo Ricardo

http://hdl.handle.net/10400.13/4986

Use this identifier to reference this record.

Name:	Description:	Size:	Format:
Belief Revision and Computational Argumentation A Critical Comparison.pdf		536.21 KB	Adobe PDF	Download

Send Feedback

Authors

Baroni, Pietro

Fermé, Eduardo

Giacomin, Massimiliano

Simari, Guillermo Ricardo

Abstract(s)

This paper aims at comparing and relating belief revision and argumentation as approaches to model reasoning processes. Referring to some prominent literature references in both fields, we will discuss their (implicit or explicit) assumptions on the modeled processes and hence commonalities and differences in the forms of reason ing they are suitable to deal with. The intended contribution is on one hand assessing the (not fully explored yet) relationships between two lively research fields in the broad area of defeasible reasoning and on the other hand pointing out open issues and potential directions for future research.

Keywords

Argumentation Theory Belief revision Dynamics of knowledge Knowledge representation Reasoning . Faculdade de Ciências Exatas e da Engenharia

URI

http://hdl.handle.net/10400.13/4986

Citation

Baroni, P., Fermé, E., Giacomin, M. et al. Belief revision and computational argumentation: a critical comparison. J of Log Lang and Inf 31, 555–589 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-022-09369-8