Loading...
Research Project
Modelos de revisão de bases de crenças para fusão de ontologias
Funder
Authors
Publications
Iterated belief change: the case of expansion into inconsistency
Publication . Fermé, Eduardo; Wassermann, Renata
Constructing models that allow iterated changes
is one of the most studied problems in the literature on belief
change. However, up to now, iteration of expansion was only
studied as a special case of consistent revision and, as far
we know, there is no work in the literature that deals with
expansions into inconsistency in a supraclassical framework.
In this paper, we provide a semantics for iterated expansion, as
well as its axiomatic characterization. We extend the model to
two well-known families of iterated belief change (natural and
lexicographic). Iteration of expansion can be combined with
existent models of iteration of revision and contraction. Since
we are able to accommodate different inconsistent belief states,
iteration of expansion allows us to define new belief change
functions that are currently only defined for belief bases: semi revision, external revision, as well as consolidation.
Domain-specific trust for context-aware BDI Agents: preliminary work
Publication . Casals, Arthur; Fermé, Eduardo; Brandao, Anarosa A. F.
Context-aware systems are capable of perceiving the physical environment where they are deployed and adapt
their behavior accordingly. Multiagent systems based on the BDI architecture can be used to process contextual
information in the form of beliefs. Contextual information can be divided and structured in the form of
information domains. Information and experience sharing enables a single agent to receive data on different
information domains from another agent. In this scenario, establishing a trust model between agents can take
into account the relative perceptions each agent has of the others, as well as different trust degrees for different
information domains. The objective of this work is to adapt an epistemic model to be used by agents with their
belief revision in order to establish a mechanism of domain-specific relative trust attribution. Such mechanism
will allow for each agent to possess different trust degrees associated with other agents regarding different
information domains.
On ensconcement and contraction
Publication . Fermé, Eduardo; Garapa, Marco; Reis, Maurício
In this article we present an axiomatic characterization for the ensconcement-based contractions. We study the interrelation
among ensconcement-based contractions and brutal contractions, and we present two ways of defining an ensconcement
relation by means of a base contraction operation. Finally, we study the interrelations among ensconcement-based contraction
and epistemic entrenchment-based contractions and among brutal contractions and severe withdrawals.
Shielded base contraction
Publication . Garapa, Marco; Fermé, Eduardo; Reis, Maurício D. L.
The one that is considered the standard model in the area of logic of belief change was
proposed by Alchourrón, Gärdenfors and Makinson in 1985 and is, nowadays, known as
the AGM model.
Two of the main shortcomings pointed out to the AGM model of belief change are the
(impractical) use of belief sets to represent belief states and the (unrealistic) acceptance of
any new information. In this paper we study a kind of operators—known as shielded base
contractions—which address both those issues. Indeed, on the one hand, these operators
are defined on belief bases (rather than belief sets) and, on the other hand, they are
constructed with the underlying idea that not all new informations are accepted.
We propose twenty different classes of shielded base contractions and obtain axiomatic
characterizations for each of them. Additionally we thoroughly investigate the interrelations
(in the sense of inclusion) among all those classes. More precisely, we analyse whether
each of those classes is or is not (strictly) contained in each of the remaining ones.
On the logic of theory change: iteration of expansion
Publication . Fermé, Eduardo; Wassermann, Renata
Constructing models that allow for iterated changes is one of the most studied problems in the literature on belief
change. However, up to now, iteration of expansion was only studied as a special case of consistent revision and, as far
we know, there is no work in the literature that deals with expansions into inconsistency in a supraclassical framework.
In this paper, we provide a semantics for iterated expansion, as well as its axiomatic characterization. We extend the
model to two well-known families of iterated belief change (natural and lexicographic). Iteration of expansion can be
combined with existent models of iteration of revision and contraction. Since we are able to accommodate different
inconsistent belief states, iteration of expansion allows us to define new belief change functions that are currently
only defined for belief bases: semi-revision, external revision, as well as consolidation.
Organizational Units
Description
Keywords
Contributors
Funders
Funding agency
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Funding programme
OE
Funding Award Number
SFRH/BSAB/127790/2016