Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
---|---|---|---|---|
853.48 KB | Adobe PDF |
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
In this paper we discuss the comments given by Regalado and Ritter (2010) on our previous work (Prada
et al., 2009). Here, we demonstrate that rainfall correction does not significantly change the results; make
clear why Site 1’s fog precipitation values do not seem to be overestimated due to the low number of
gauges; present observational evidence that suggest high water yields in Site 1; and why we consider
that fog water may be important for groundwater recharge. We also review different methodological,
ecological and climatic factors between Madeira and the Canary Islands’ fog precipitation studies that
might explain different values between them (Ritter et al., 2008, 2009).
Description
Keywords
Fog precipitation Rainfall correction High altitude tree heath forest Groundwater recharge . Faculdade de Ciências da Vida Faculdade de Ciências Exatas e da Engenharia
Citation
Prada, S., Sequeira, M. M., Figueira, C., Prior, V., & Silva, M. O. (2010). Response to “Comment on fog precipitation and rainfall interception in the natural forests of Madeira Island (Portugal)”. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 150(7-8), 1154-1157.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.04.009
Publisher
Elsevier