| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 305.8 KB | Adobe PDF |
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
Some individuals seem to intuitively collaborate better in teams, and some teams have repetitively
superior results. Cooperative work is a growing need in all workplaces, and it has been thoroughly
studied. However, literature has not yet clearly identified its predictors, as it does not present
consistent results. Some authors report a reluctance in students to collaborate in teams, whereas
others describe its huge advantages. This work intends to explore variables that might influence
collaborative learning. We hypothesize that the team size and the scientific field of the students
might affect team collaboration and team performance. In this study with Pre- and Post-test, team
collaboration was measured using the Team Collaboration Evaluator (TCE) and team performance
was assessed by the students’ perceived team effectiveness and by the final project grade given
by the instructors. Analysis of a sample of 99 students, from both Computer Science and
Psychology bachelor programs, indicates that larger teams show lower team collaboration, but
higher team performance. Collected data confirm differences in the evolution of the perceived team
collaboration, according to the students’ scientific field. Results are discussed considering the
Team Collaboration Evaluator framework.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Collaborative learning Cooperative work Perceived team effectiveness Team collaboration Team performance . Faculdade de Artes e Humanidades Faculdade de Ciências Exatas e da Engenharia
Contexto Educativo
Citação
Dulce Pacheco and Luísa Soares. Collaborative Learning: Team Size and the Scientific Field as Influencers. 2018. DOI: 10.14236/ewic/HCI2018.114
Editora
BCS Learning and Development Ltd.
