Loading...
Publication
O enfoque qualitativo na avaliação de programas psicoeducativos: Aplicações e contributos da metodologia qualitativa
| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 173.66 KB | Adobe PDF |
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Os programas psicoeducativos surgem, nas mais diversas áreas, como uma oportunidade
de desenvolvimento pessoal, verificando-se uma demanda crescente de propostas baseadas na
evidência. Na avaliação destes programas assiste-se porém a alguma insatisfação com a
metodologia quantitativa, sobretudo, quando não permite perceber profundamente os processos
de mudança. O objetivo deste trabalho é ilustrar o contributo da metodologia qualitativa à
investigação desenvolvida, através da apresentação de três processos distintos: a) entrevista
semiestruturada (construída a partir da abordagem fenomenológica e utilizada como avaliação
pré-teste, pós-teste e follow-up num programa de educação parental); b) metodologia
observacional (útil para avaliação formativa de programas e análise do processo de mudança de
comportamentos ao longo dos programas); e c) Q-set da Resiliência Familiar (método misto,
originalmente construído para a avaliação do funcionamento resiliente das famílias em risco
psicossocial). Apresentam-se os resultados alcançados em estudos realizados e discute-se a
pertinência da sua aplicação no âmbito da avaliação da intervenção psicoeducativa.
Psychoeducational programmes appear, in several areas, as an opportunity for personal development, and there is a growing demand for evidence-based interventions. Yet, in its evaluation framework has been recognized some dissatisfaction with the quantitative methodology, especially when it does not contribute to deeply understand the processes of change. The objective of this paper is to illustrate the contribution of qualitative methodology to research, presenting three different processes: a) semi-structured interview (it was built considering the phenomenological approach and was used for a pre-test, post-test and follow-up assessment in a parenting educational programme); observational method (useful for training programmes assessment and analysis of the process of behavior change occurred over the programmes); and c) Q-set of family resilience (mixed method, originally built for the evaluation of the resilient functioning of psychosocial risk families). We present the results obtained and we discusses the relevance of its application in the assessment of psychoeducational intervention.
Psychoeducational programmes appear, in several areas, as an opportunity for personal development, and there is a growing demand for evidence-based interventions. Yet, in its evaluation framework has been recognized some dissatisfaction with the quantitative methodology, especially when it does not contribute to deeply understand the processes of change. The objective of this paper is to illustrate the contribution of qualitative methodology to research, presenting three different processes: a) semi-structured interview (it was built considering the phenomenological approach and was used for a pre-test, post-test and follow-up assessment in a parenting educational programme); observational method (useful for training programmes assessment and analysis of the process of behavior change occurred over the programmes); and c) Q-set of family resilience (mixed method, originally built for the evaluation of the resilient functioning of psychosocial risk families). We present the results obtained and we discusses the relevance of its application in the assessment of psychoeducational intervention.
Description
Keywords
Metodologia qualitativa Programa psicoeducativo Instrumentos Avaliação Eficácia Qualitative methodology Psychoeducational programme Instruments Assessment Effectiveness . Faculdade de Artes e Humanidades
Citation
Antunes, A., Xavier, J., Borges, A., Dorta, M., Naveiras, E., Cadenas, M., ... & Miranda, C. (2016). O enfoque qualitativo na avaliação de programas psicoeducativos: Aplicações e contributos da metodologia qualitativa. CIAIQ2016, V. 3, 524-533.